Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lal Bahadur Shastri Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Football in India. valid ATD. Solves to the lack of mention, and putting content where reader may be searching. Star  Mississippi  03:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Lal Bahadur Shastri Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Has been tagged for months regarding notability by, without seeing any additional information added to bolster notability. Current sourcing is simply either stats pages or a routine blurb about the 2006 match (one source doesn't even mention the tournament). Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Football in India. No evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment I found no mention of Lal Bahadur Shastri Cup at Football in India so I'm not sure how helpful a redirect would be. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Err how about we simply add the mention... GiantSnowman 17:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge to Football in India per WP:ATD-M. No indication of meeting GNG on its own but the lead can be merged as is by creating a section there. The results table may have to go. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.