Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalainia Lindbjerg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 03:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Lalainia Lindbjerg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of a voice actress. As always, actors are not handed an automatic free WP:NACTOR pass just because roles have been listed -- to be considered notable just for having been in stuff, she needs to be the subject of media coverage about her performances in stuff. But the closest thing there is to sourcing here is the external links to her own Twitter and her profiles on IMDb and the IMDb equivalent for the anime genre, none of which are notability-supporting sources. Again, we require coverage about her, not just cursory verification in comprehensive "all actors" directories that she exists. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment she does have some news articles as a theatre actress in Vancouver, such as this article: also appears in  .  Bulma in DBZ Ocean is a significant role, and her role in the Sabrina the Teenage Witch movie as a main antagonist.   AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * For her roles in DBZ Ocean or Sabrina the Teenage Witch to count as notability claims, she has to be the subject of reliable source coverage about those performances — merely asserting that a role was significant or major is not a notability freebie that exempts a person from having to be the subject of coverage about the role. But the source you've provided for Sabrina is the production company's own self-published website about itself, not a reliable or notability-supporting source. And for the local theatre sources, two of the three sources you provided merely namecheck her existence a single time without being about her — and the one article that is about her is from a local community weekly pennysaver in the context of having one role with the local community theatre, which is neither a notability claim in the first place nor a strong enough source to singlehandedly carry her over WP:GNG all by itself if all the rest of the sourcing is junk. Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The community one is at least to demonstrate that she has been covered by an independent secondary source. That's not to say her Vancouver theatre work is Wikipedia-notable; it probably isn't. The DBZ shows a starring role in a significant show and the same with the Sabrina film, shows significance not a throwaway background part. But overall this would still be borderline WP:ENT. And please note, I'm not voting for Keep on this article as I personally don't think this is enough. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment If you look at my history, you will see that I started it the day that I joined Wikipedia back in 2006 when I was a huge Gundam freak. I have moved on to other things in the subsequent 11 years hence I don't really have any serious attachment to it. If there aren't enough sources to establish notability, by all means delete it. Shaneymike (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment no appearances logged at any major anime conventions:  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete of the three sources identified above, only one is indepth about her, and that would not be enough to pass GNG on its own. Additionally it is a local, human interest type story, and clearly just being the subject of one such story in one of thousands of local papers with pages to fill is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.