Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalaland

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was transwiki to Wiktionary. Completed. Rossami (talk) 23:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lalaland
neol. dicdef. (btw, there seems to be quite a rich vein of articles that need cleanup, deletion, etc at Special:Deadendpages, hence my several vfd entries tonight). Sc147 02:09, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dictionary definition, neologism. Megan1967 02:32, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've been familiar with this expression for nearly 4 decades so it cannot be considered a neologism. Can easily form the basis of a good article. Keep. --Centauri 06:16, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. Not a neologism, but still a dictdef.  I don't see how it could turn into anything encyclopedic, though I'm open to convincing. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 06:23, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * But merge with la-la land first, and send them both (as the latter). &mdash;Korath (Talk) 06:27, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to la-la land. Grue 19:03, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * If kept, lalaland (~41,200 Google hits) should really be merged into la-la land (~202,000), not from it. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:38, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, I changed my vote. Grue 07:18, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete/tranwiki both if not expanded, but if kept, I think a better title is La-la Land or La-La Land, as it's a place, in theory, though not an existing one. -R. fiend 04:41, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikidictionary. -CunningLinguist 12:36, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.