Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalaland (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Lalaland (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic AI startup   scope_creep Talk  18:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - routine coverage for a start-up company, many of the sources have issues. 1292simon (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Adequate coverage in cited sources, specifically:, , . Their Philips Innovation Award is also compelling. ~Kvng (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Startup companies are very unlikely to be notable in a year. See Chemcon, red link, but came earlier than Lala land, say 2015. Computer age management services is a red link also and  came as early as chemcon.Acidic Carbon (Talk)  (Organic compounds) 13:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: this is definitely a borderline case however I am of the opinion that sustained, significant coverage has not yet been achieved in the requisite depth to establish corporate notability per my source analysis below.   SITH   (talk)   13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete My analysis of the above table-is that none of the sources are both substantial and reliable. I do not see the awards as being one that confers notability, so neither does the announcement that it has been awarded.  DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur with the analysis above and I am unable to locate any other references that may be used to establish notability. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It does not show convincing notability for an encyclopedic entry. Northern Escapee (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable, maybe WP:TOOSOON -- Devoke water  (talk)  09:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also fails WP:GNG. Zing ( Talk! ) 04:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.