Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lali Watt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Lali Watt
Non-notable local politician, see guidelines at WP:BIO Ronnotel 01:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

As per WP:BIO:
 *  Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage. 
 *  Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability. 

Lali Watt has not received significant press coverage - just some minor mentions in connection with a zoning issue she was involved in. Ronnotel 01:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Aaron 01:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Firstly, allow me to state that this subject exist. However, it does not meet verifiability content, which is a key policy of Wikipedia. The article in question lacks material that has been published by reputable sources. A google search clearly supports my statement. The 6 unique google hits which link to this subject is of questionable sources. This clearly shows that the politician has not received any significant press coverage yet. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  02:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable including group (CALM) she founded.Glendoremus 06:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The Wilmette, Illinois article seems to indicate a lack of notablity here --T-rex 06:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 08:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO, not enough press coverage to pass. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom --Amxitsa 21:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 01:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.