Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamar Stevens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  A  Train talk 09:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Lamar Stevens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCOLLATH.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Only available sources are routine sports reporting.-- Rockchalk 717 03:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Change to keep due to multiple sources being found beyond routine sports reporting allowing him to pass WP:GNG.-- Rockchalk 717 16:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * For clarification I was referring to the sources that the user identifying themselves as "Eddy" has found.-- Rockchalk 717 16:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete – Non-notable college basketball player, no evidence he meets the GNG, fails WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NCOLLATH. Created by an editor with a history of dubious basketball-related article creations. – AaronWikia (talk) 03:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not just basketball. Looking through the editors talkpage they have had several created articles nominated for deletion, at least half appeared to plagiarism.-- Rockchalk 717 06:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Meets GNG with multiple coverage in reliable sources :    . Also was NIT MVP. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 14:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notability established. See above. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - sources provided are only routine and most are non-independent. Just saying.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you elaborate on which ones are non-independent? ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 01:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The Pennlive ones, I would imagine. Deb (talk) 10:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * pennlive is The Patriot-News, hence it is independent. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 12:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I was just guessing. This is not my field. Deb (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the coverage is routine, not indepth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.