Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamara Qoqiauri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Lamara Qoqiauri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced WP:RESUME. Appears to be WP:AUTOBIO based on creator's username. This person may meet WP:GNG but would require a complete rewrite. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've seen only pretty limited mentioning of this person's work online, and it looks like notability isn't really established. Even if it was established, I think this article would be at the 'burn it to pieces and start over' stage anyways. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Question: is being terribly written, ready for WP:BLOWITUP and presumably created by the subject grounds for deletion? if so, I'm in.New Media Theorist (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as although I found sources here, here and here, this would need to be restarted and it's worth noting the Georgian Wiki is basically the same and from one perspective, if no one has fixed the native language article, there's a half chance they're not going to fix this one. Inviting and  for comment.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article (I use the word generously because really it's a cv) has no independent sources. Repec has very little coverage of academic economics in Georgia and she is not mentioned. Google scholar shows that she has published but not that she has been cited. I am willing to believe that we are missing a lot of information because of the language barrier, but we have nothing to give us the basis for an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Uncertain. Even assuming we could source all the information, and look for citations, I think if the information could be verified,  she would qualify as WP:PROF. Possibly not as a researcher: we have generally interpreted WP:PROF this to mean notable on an international scale, for science is international. But social sciences, especially the applied social science are often country or region specific. but we have no way to look for citations.  She would possibly qualify under WP:PROF provision 4 "The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education."  Her bibliography shows she has written what would seem to be major textbooks, and I would think they might be widely used within the country.   But this is speculative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.