Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambda Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. Pigman ☿ 02:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Lambda Productions

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Web of six interconnected articles (of which one, Pablito SacoRojo, was earlier nominated separately), all about completely non-notable subjects. At first, I thought it was nothing but a hoax--a Lambda Productions does exist, but it's clearly not the company the article is about, and "Davi Jueves" and "Esteban Iceberg" yield no Google hits except to Wikipedia itself, mirrors, and coincidental conjunctions of words). Plus, aside from the implausibility of some of the content (for example, La Vida Saludable Con Davi "grossed a worldwide total of $0" and "was an instant success"?), the external (and some internal) links link either to nonexistent pages or to other locations than they claim (the link allegedly to the IMdB entry for Esteban Iceberg, for example, actually goes to the | entry for Spike Jonze, and the link to "Gremlin Award" in Davi Jueves actually goes to Academy_Awards). But then I googled "La Vida Saludable Con Davi" and found this. So "La Vida Saludable Con Davi" does exist, as a ten-minute video on YouTube. Which means this isn't just a hoax--it's a whole network of articles created to publicize a YouTube video. Which may be worse. --Smeazel (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because they're all part of the same interconnected set of articles:

Also, as mentioned above, Pablito SacoRojo, also part of this web of articles, has its own AfD here.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —Smeazel (talk) 16:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete All per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 20:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. I know "per nom" is frowned upon, but after checking for myself, there's nothing more to add to the detail already provided in the nomination. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.