Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambs Will Gambol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Krazy Kat and/or Krazy Kat filmography. Consensus is that the film is not notable enough for its own standalone article. -Scottywong | communicate _ 17:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Lambs Will Gambol

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Disputed prod. No claim of notability. No apparent notability.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  05:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable.TheLongTone (talk) 07:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment The title appears to be misspelt, with the infobox and most sources giving Lambs Will Gamble (see e.g. IMDb).
 * There's a few more results if you search for this name. Google Books indicates coverage (without giving the full text) in
 * Edwin M. Bradley's The first Hollywood sound shorts, 1926-1931 (McFarland, 2005)
 * Graham Webb's The animated film encyclopedia: a complete guide to American shorts, features and sequences 1900-1979 (McFarland, 2000)
 * It may still not be notable, but might be merged or redirected to Krazy Kat. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. A notable piece of animation, which captures via satirical parody an important segment of socioeconomic history. Rotten regard (talk) 22:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Comment. I don't know about the correct title, but lambs are much more likely to gambol than to gamble. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:56, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The proper title of Lambs Will Gamble and the cartoon's content itself is reflective of how sepeculators "gambled" their monies in the stock market and ultimately lost big in 1929. It was intended to be a "cute" homophone of the gambol movement of lambs.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect (after correcting the spelling) to Krazy Kat filmography. There is nothing to indicate this short film was ever notable. --MelanieN (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 10:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - May not meet WP:GNG. The only thing I found was Lambs will gambol with rejuvenated Rodman on the road to Wembley. It's not about the film. The film was released in 1930, so there may be off line sources. If those are found, feel free to start a new article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 02:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You do know you were looking under an incorrect title, yes? The film is called Lambs Will Gamble, and THAT title is sourcable. Requiring a page move to proper title is not a reason to require re-writing a mis-titled article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:35, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.