Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamyai Haithongkham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep -- withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet 01:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Lamyai Haithongkham

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It sounds like a promotion and is very stubby and just not a very good article in general. I don't think it is well-received either. xdude (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep — What the hell? A high profile singer in Thailand! Plenty of significant coverage both included in the article and per search with her Thai name ลำไย ไหทองคำ . WP:GNG is met. For WP:NSINGER criteria is met or not, I left for Thai editors! Cheers VocalIndia (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — A high profile singer in Thailand, but not in America. WP:NSINGER is not inherently met, as her awards are not incredibly prestigious. Her record label is not big either. None of her albums are on Wikipedia. And finally, only music magazines mention her, no big books of "Best Thai Artists" or reliable sources. xdude (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * As the nominator you can not !vote as well. Change to Comment.BabbaQ (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment A high profile singer in Thailand, but not in America is not a valid deletion rationale. We do not write articles based off of what is popular in the US. -Indy beetle (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep — Per coverage. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. No actual reason for deletion given. AfD is not for clean-up. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Who cares if she’s not big in Iowa? Passes WP:GNG. Mccapra (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok then. You've all been quite harsh and had your fun. Keep. But the tone was very self-advertising I think. xdude (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.