Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lancaster Public Library


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy . Article was userfied, which makes sense. No reason to keep cross-space re-direct. When/if article is mainspace worthy, it can be moved back preserving GFDL history. Etc. StarM 04:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Lancaster Public Library

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining db-empty speedy, and there are too many hits here for me to evaluate. The 40 summaries that I've skimmed don't suggest notability, but you never know, maybe sources will be found. - Dank (push to talk) 02:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 02:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 02:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The best course in this situation might be to suggest that the article be created in user space and also point out WP:ORG and that the article will be held against that standard. The problem is not necessarily that the library system is not notable but that the article hasn't even gotten started. Drawn Some (talk) 02:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to user space until it can be expanded. However, if it is recreated, the name should reflect that this is Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and not Lancaster. UK, which also has a library service. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  02:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed about the rename, the Google archives hits were about 50-50 between the two. - Dank (push to talk) 02:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfied. Now this discussion is about what to do with the redirect I left behind. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The redirect can be G6'd for now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfication is deletion from mainspace; what's the deletion rationale, SNOW, or one of the speedy criteria? (I can see G2 here, but I brought it to AfD because I was looking for some discussion rather than a quick deletion.) - Dank (push to talk) 03:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'd say G2. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.