Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Christensen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Lance Christensen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD; non-notable political candidate. While he would be notable if he wins, he currently fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 18:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians,  and California. Curbon7 (talk) 18:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice against re-creation if the wins the election. Currently fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. The only available sources appear to be either WP:PRIMARY or containing only routine campaign coverage, insufficient for establishing notability. Sal2100 (talk) 17:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * what a lousy reason to delete a page. Keep it. Does not matter if he wins or not. 2600:1700:D640:6BB0:B9C1:6DA9:8657:1A1A (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per Curbon7 and Sal2100. Based on this version of the page, references 1. 3, 5, 10, and 11 are all WP:PRIMARY, and references 2 and 7 are routine coverage. Sources 7 and 8 are from California Globe, which is considered generally unreliable, sources 4 and 6 only mention him, a source 9 is a podcast that also only motions him during a brief segment. Does not qualify for notability as it fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG, though he potentially could if he wins and if there is more sources around that (and if he does things noteworthy in office). reppoptalk 19:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.