Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Humphrey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SKCRIT#1, the nominator has failed to advance an argument for deletion and no one else recommends that the page be deleted.They clearly pass WP:NCRIC, as they've played first-class cricket and Twenty20 cricket. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Lance Humphrey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason Chickenpox12345 (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Describing Lance as making a first class debut impedes his chances of playing cricket in another country. 1st class is not the same standard in various countries accross the world and he may be deemed as a professional cricket player when he is not.

Lance Humphrey can be researched on a number of cricket sites such as ESPN and does not warrant a Wikipedia page.


 * Keep meets WP:NCRIC, having played in first-class and Twenty20 matches. AfD is not the place to debate the classification of first-class cricket from one country to the next. And how did you find out about the AfD process with your first edit?  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 21.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Lugnuts' comments. bojo  &#124;  talk  13:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * If he genuinely meets WP:NCRIC and is judged notable, it's entirely irrelevant whether having a Wikipedia article impedes or helps "his chances" of doing anything. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.