Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Nielsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep consensus of dicussion is to keep, if article needs cleanup then that should be done, del inappropriate Fr33kman talk  APW 22:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Lance Nielsen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is unsourced, has no in-linking Wikipedia pages, and appears very much to be an autobiography. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 05:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   — WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 05:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment None of the three points in the nomination are reasons for deletion, but reasons for cleanup. The crucial point is whether reliable and significant coverage of him exists, not whether it's in the article at present. However, since I can find no such coverage of him in news, Google books, or reliable websites deletion may be the correct course. Olaf Davis | Talk 13:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This from the article is a start, but not quite enough on its own to establish notability. Olaf Davis | Talk 13:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. In addition to the Guardian article noted above, there is a BBC news article and an Evening Standard article.  Sufficient to establishnotability, if that is what is in question.  As previously noted, the nominating rationales are all reasons for cleaning up the article and not deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Good finds, Whpq. Definitely enough to justify keeping. Olaf Davis | Talk 23:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.