Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Tsosie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Lance Tsosie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Individual isn't known for anything of note outside of TikTok drama. Sources are shaky at best, other sources are lacking; there's nothing of value here. Xxelyas (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources in the article seem to keep this subject passing WP:GNG. Even if several sources are about controversies, that doesn't matter. SPF121188  (talk this way) (contribs) 16:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm striking my keep !vote. Looking through sources more closely, I agree with . SPF121188  (talk this way) (contribs) 15:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Sourcing is largely about how this person has negatively interacted with other Native people online or about the launch of an Onlyfans. The "controversy" has a fair amount of coverage, but it's not exclusively about this individual. What we do have is rather small mentions of him. Oaktree b (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * This entry should be deleted as he has added nothing to society and has done nothing but be destructive and this just justifies his view 2403:5808:420D:0:84D7:B6D2:D71:6807 (talk) 04:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not really the issue being discussed, thank you for your input regardless. Oaktree b (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Arizona.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to get more opinions and because I've become suspicious of brand new accounts whose first edit is to tag an article for deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Tik Tok notability is a difficult construct for biographies of living people. Mr. Tsosie has/had a large following on Tik Tok, but he is outside the top 50 content creators by 10s of millions of followers. He has zero notable accomplishments outside of being a participant in a Tik Tok controversy that gained some news coverage but which may also fail to meet notability guidelines. The discussion of his supposed marriage status is the very definition of "original research" using primary sources rather than secondary sources. He has a few appearances in press about campus activism and nothing else. He is not a published author, journalist, scholar. He is not a leader in any notable organizations. There is no reason for him to have a biography at this point in his life. There are insufficient secondary sources to justify more than a stub. 74.64.143.105 (talk) 13:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.