Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. And this AFD also has low participation though more than the first AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Last AfD had low participation. Boleyn (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep: They've been around for 40 years and have a history of preservation. This is an example of the work they do . This article now is written like a request for funding announcement and should be re-written (by another editor please), but I think we have notability.  Oaktree b (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * One more for good measure Oaktree b (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The sourcing isn't super convincing, but there's enough for me to !vote keep. A web search for the org's name turns up tons of results, some of which are passing mentions in press releases, but some of which is real coverage about the group and their work. The first source from Oaktree above is clearly SIGCOV. This radio piece, this article , and this (archived) article are also all decent.  Toadspike   [Talk]  07:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.