Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land Rover Land e


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete in its present form (there are strong copyright concerns), but allow for recreation with suitable text. Tyrenius 00:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Land Rover Land e
Came across an incomplete nomination from June 25 - posting for completion - no vote Gay Cdn 19:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It appears KarenAnn nomintated this for for being an advert. It appears to be an actual vechicle made by a notable company. I don't think deletion is a subsitute for some cleanup. Yank  sox  19:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per copyright concerns. Yank  sox  22:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a 'concept car' that does not exist as a functioning vehicle - see 2nd paragraph here. The picture may be copyvio and I wonder where the text is from? I think the article is misleading and suggest delete because of all the uncertainties. BlueValour 02:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, probably notable concept car with substantial press coverage (per Google). Needs cleanup though. Sandstein 05:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice obvious ad copy (original author's only contribs related to this article, surpise, surpise). If a third party editor wants to write an article on this, though, based on secondary soruces, I have no problem with it coming back on the wiki. JChap  (Talk) 21:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark 16:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. Reasonable subject for article, but this ain't it. -- GWO
 * Delete without prejudice advertising and largely a cut'n'paste copyvio from www.carkeys.co.uk. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 'delete please this is a copyright violation we can not have it Yuckfoo 17:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.