Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landi Khana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) B  music  ian  02:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Landi Khana

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not believe the subject meets the criteria for inclusion. I can find very few references to this station beyond semi-reliable websites that verify that it does exist (not in itself an argument for notability, of course). I do not believe it could ever be expanded into a stand alone article of worth, and I don't believe there is even enough verifiable information for it to be merged into Torkham (or Towr Kham). S.G.(GH) ping! 15:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No references, no indication of wp:notability, rw notability looks unlikely. No content to be lost, just one sentence that says that it exists and where it is. North8000 (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete For reason above. Can easily be merged in elsewhere if needed for some reason. Calabe1992 16:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment added 10 references to the article. Haus Talk 18:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The station is notable and several reliable sources demonstrate this. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 05:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep An unusual railroad station, possibly the last one built by the British Raj in South Asia. The station was built at an unusual historical crossroads in tribal areas, and there is plenty more written about it, even in English, than is required for notability. "Notability looks likely." Pseudofusulina (talk) 06:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The article doesn't seem to state any of that. Needs to be added. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please feel free to add anything you feel needs to be added. Pseudofusulina (talk) 23:53, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The article has plenty of references now, and railway stations are generally considered notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 06:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Issues about the current state of the article fall under AfD is not cleanup.  Haus Talk 15:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Longstanding precedent says we keep articles on railway stations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources given in the article to verify notability. Mar4d (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.