Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landis W. Garrison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  01:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Landis W. Garrison

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SOLDIER. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment May I presume your argument for deletion that is actually based on policies/guidelines is "fails WP:GNG"? - The Bushranger One ping only 00:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Let's just say this has been a controversy. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG, completely non-notable. Mztourist (talk) 02:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails both the notability guidelines for soldiers and GNG. It is high time we started to actually enforce our notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per my response to the above nearly-identical delete !votes on every one of these nominations. WP:GNG is a guideline, and WP:SOLDIER is an essay. I count six reliable third-party sources; is there some reason these don't satisfy WP:V and imply WP:N? jp×g 18:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * We should allow subject specific guidelines to impose tougher restrictions than GNG. GNG is such a low nar that it does not really mean people are in any way truly notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale provided by, I do not believe WP:SOLDIER is met. Celestina007 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly does not meet WP:SOLDIER, as for WP:GNG he got the coverage because he was a soldier so he should be judged by WP:SOLDIER. You also have to consider WP:SINGLEEVENT shooting your self while deployed, is a minor event. While the event is verifiable, it is not notable nor is the subject. "We were in our living quarters, when Garrison, just playing around, inadvertently shot himself." source Jeepday (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.