Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lando (speakers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly  ( Talk ) 20:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Lando (speakers)

 * — (View AfD)

Nomination for deletion Looks like a failure of WP:CORP. ~52 google hits for this company's flagship product. About 4 non-spam/wikimirror hits for "lando speakers". I'm very sympathetic to WP:BIAS but I don't think there is a systematic bias issue here as 1) We're talking about a luxury electronics product that should have international recognition if it really is encyclopedically notable and 2) Brazil culturally dominates Google's social networking service, Orkut, so its not like this product comes from a country behind in their googling Bwithh 05:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A thinly disguised ad. Akihabara 06:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 06:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete to speedy, would have speedied it if I came across it first. SkierRMH, 08:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TSO1D 14:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Sneaky advertising. "I don't trust Lando."  Wavy G 00:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Just to say that I did not speedy-nom this as I don't believe it was deliberate spam. I looked at the edit history and user page of the article creator and concluded that he is just a Brazilian music enthusiast. anyway, that's what I thought Bwithh 01:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I created the article! Believe me, I have no relationship to the manufacturer lol: I just have a pair of those and they are quiet popular in Brazil and even elsewhere. But hey, democracy speaks, so if you wan't to delete, go ahead! :-) Matias 12:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, just to clarify, this is a discussion to generate consensus within policy and guidelines... Wikipedia is not a democracy Bwithh 20:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.