Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landover Baptist Church (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Though could someone please add some sources the ensure we don't do this a fourth time? Courcelles 00:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Landover Baptist Church
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No proof of notability; only source is primary. Difluoroethene (talk) 07:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The Landover Baptist Church is not a church, it is a website that parodies fundamentalist Christianity. The Google Books tool above provides ample proof that the website is notable, as it has received significant coverage in several books.  It is not necessary that an article in its current state provide "proof" of notability.  The article should be improved through normal editing rather than being deleted. Cullen328 (talk) 13:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - well-known website, however obnoxious some folks find it. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable satirical website. Additional sources exist and should be added to the page to support notability. (I may do that myself unless other people do that first.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - can this discussion be closed now? It seems, like the first AfD 6 years ago, a done deal. Besides the nominator even announces on their user page they have one foot out the door on Wikipedia. It all seems like a moot point and a touch too much of WP:IDL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.82.32.215 (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not "one foot out the door", I'm just too busy (at this point) to contribute as often as I used to. Difluoroethene (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as it does not meet WP:N. The article is not referenced and the content of the article is unverifiable. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 05:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google Books sources attest notability; sourcing problems with article can be corrected through normal editing. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.