Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landshark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep. I, the nominator of the article, withdraw my nomination, and there are no delete votes in evidence. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 13:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Landshark
This is an unusual nomination. I am the original creator of this page, but I am not (repeat, not) saying it should be deleted. Nor am I saying it should be kept. I am abstaining from voting on this page. I am submitting it to AfD because it is the only page I have created where I feel a slight twinge of guilt for having done so. Some days I think it's a perfectly valid article that needs a little cleanup. Other days I suspect it probably should be deleted altogether. Since I can't objectively decide, I submit it to AfD's tender mercies. Debate on it as ye will. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 12:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if you are the article creator, the reason you're nominating it would be nice. It seems like a perfectly good article to me, the only problem being the lack of sources. Leaning towards Keep at the moment. --Last Malthusian 13:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Apparently we have an entire category of SNL sketches. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * In that case, I withdraw my nomination. Sorry for the bother. → Ξxtreme Unction  {yak ł blah } 13:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.