Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane Caudell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. ~ GB fan 14:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Lane Caudell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Only the unreliable IMDb is used, which isn't by itself enough to warrant an article, and any other sources found are subpar and/or don't go into much depth on him. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seems to have only had minor roles. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm that is all terrifically minor but as far as I'm concerned should add up to notability, even though by a thin margin. Weak keep, with thanks to E.M. Gregory's work. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:HEY the Hal Erickson book I just added, after Drmies made his comment, puts it over the top. Minor roles, minor attention paid, plus minor attention paid to singer-songwriter career.  It is useful to readers to be able to identify minor actors in films.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Though the Hal Erickson book offers a fair amount of depth, Courier-Tribune gives less than a cumulative paragraph on him (not enough for WP:SIGCOV), and I can't really assess the Globe and Mail citation as it requires a login. Could you perhaps find something more accessible? One citation with significant coverage by itself isn't enough and it's hard to measure citations that need logins. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits</b>) 16:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Added source as requested by Nom. A  book. More books and magazine and newspaper stories show up in searches.   And, of course, paywalled sources are legitimate sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The additions do help. I'm not saying paywalled sources are bad, only that it's harder to assess their depth. Anyway, Days of Our Lives: A Complete History of the Long-Running Soap Opera only contains a very minor mention of him, but I'm with the Band: Confessions of a Groupie goes into much more detail and might be just enough for this page to be worth keeping unless anybody has objections over its credibility. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 23:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.