Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langham Place Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Non admin closure.  Th e Su nshi ne M an  11:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Langham Place Hong Kong

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy for a couple hotels. Procedural listing. I am also nominating the following related contested speedy page:
 * - BanyanTree 11:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Langham Place, Hong Kong and this redirected to that. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 12:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep No reason to delete just remove excessive commercial schpiel. And the London Hotel certainly shouldn't be deleted. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually it seems to be a duplicate of an older article Langham Place- I think the two should be merged to this title to be more specific. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually they appear to be by identical- it looks like someone just wanted the article moved to this title but didn't know how to do it. So, speedy delete this then move Langham Place to this title. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Or maybe the title should be Langham Place, Hong Kong? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, Langham Place Office Tower is Kowloon's tallest building (and HK's seventh tallest) at the present moment and one of Hong Kong's most prominent developments. Langham Place is a huge development in the Yau Tsim Mong district, and is a notable complex. Whatever is unencyclopedic and of advertising nature, it can be removed. Langham Hotel, London just needs a rewrite, its a notable hotel in London. The Times and The New York Times does have reviews of the British hotel.  Terence 12:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Terence Ong. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  12:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This was just created by mistake as a duplicate of Langham Place. I believe the Langham Place article should be moved to
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.