Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lango (conlang)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 16:24, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Lango (conlang)
Nothing seem related to it in google, not notable, I say delete Kiba 17:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kiba. Nandesuka 17:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * "Among the sadly common sights of Wiki-Hell: ... Neologists and conlangers, who invented words - or worse yet, entire languages - and posted them as articles, condemned to an eternity spouting nothing but meaningless self-made words in unknown tongues, these uncromulently disembiggened souls are denied the ability to engage in intelligent communication with others!" ... We know where this article goes. :-) Delete. --Idont Havaname 18:13, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I don't see why the previous speaker deems it necessary to insult conlangers and other people with linguistic creativity. But that aside, we seem to be dealing here with IAL/euroclone no. ###, and to that a hardly verifiable one. --IJzeren Jan 18:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * It wasn't an insult from me - it was a direct quote out of the Wiki-Hell subpage that User:BD2412 created. He sometimes bans things to Wiki-Hell on VfD, and since conlangs are part of Wiki-Hell, I thought I could do the honors this time. --Idont Havaname 18:36, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, if you quote somebody like that, you take responsability over what you write. But it's fine. Just be a little polite, and don't insult people who have interests that you cannot understand. --IJzeren Jan 18:43, 24 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, as Idont Havaname has already done the condemning of this non-notable creation. -- BD2412 talk 19:53, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. – ishwar  (speak)  21:07, 2005 July 24 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is essentially a creative work in progress. Would we want an article on a movie that was just at the conceptual stage?  Still, if someone wrote 1000 articles in the language and started a new wikipedia... Peter Grey 04:47, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity, not yet notable, unless good evidence to the contrary provided. Attempts to search this in Google Scholar and such are greatly complicated by the existence of the real Lango, which happens to be a Western Nilotic language spoken in Uganda . But as nearly as I can tell there are no relevant hits in Google Scholar. I'm limited by not knowing Russian, but as nearly as I can tell the Lango conlang website itself provides no evidence whatever that this is more than one person's pet project. Dpbsmith (talk) 13:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn conlang. JamesBurns 07:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability per CONLANG.  It's not even listed on Langmaker, for pete's sake.  Almafeta 13:37, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.