Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Connections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Language Connections

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:CORP. Company website is currently laden with spam for Viagra on every sub-page, though obviously that alone isn't grounds for deletion, and their site may have been hijacked. No evidence given for claims for customer list, and can't find any online. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Altered Walter (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw talk 09:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - just can't see how this passes WP:CORPDEPTH. The sources are a combination of directory listings and pages from the company's own website (which seems to be working again now). The last half of the sources relate to the paragraph about a single employee. Having done a search, I can't find any coverage that would be considered "significant" in any way. But I'd be happy to consider anything anyone else can find. Stalwart 111  12:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I did find one States News Service piece from July 2012, but it is basically a press release on work done by the firm for USRCCNE, with whom the article says they are associated, so cant be considered a WP:RS. Too little there for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. No reliable sources. Barely meets WP:GNG. Delete per Stalwart173.13.150.22 (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.