Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lanny Quarles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Lanny Quarles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable person Wuh  Wuz  Dat  14:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - No sentiment shown for deletion outside of nominator. Carrite (talk) 00:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't...is that a reason for...how does that...what?--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Think of my vote as a debate starter. Time to finish off these superannuated Nobody Gives a Crap random notability challenges seemingly created by use of an automated challenging machine. Carrite (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh. Well ok. In this case the article should probably be deleted anyway though, even if the nominator still had bad intentions. If you want, just consider my argument to be the main !vote so far. No reason to let one editor doing things out of bad faith affect the quality of the encyclopedia as a whole.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Per lack of any significant coverage in reliable and independent sources to show notability.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Person does not appear to be notable outsite of his genre of work. The external links do nothing to establish his notability.   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 06:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.