Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lanpham-2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Lanpham-2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely nothing to suggest this meets WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. I can find no coverage outside of what is provided in the article, which only goes to prove its existence. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - There isn't even a Lanpham-1. Plus, none of the cast members have their own Wikipedia article, so it fails WP:GNG per the nominator.  Yoshiman6464   ♫🥚 23:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. This is a promo piece created by a non-declared COI editor (same name as the director). --Domdeparis (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Spiderone  20:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFILM and basic WP:GNG.Purely promotional. Nothing notable about subject. Article lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Sources in article are PR announcements.  CBS 527 Talk 17:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   23:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.