Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lansdown, Cheltenham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Lansdown, Cheltenham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Improperly sourced and written like a resume, but primarily because it fails to establish the location's notability. Per WP:NRV, "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep -- The older parts of Cheltenham are a Regency spa town. This article is still a poor stub, but that is no reason for deletion.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * keep Cheltenham is world-famous for its Regency architecture and social history as a spa, and Lansdown is at the heart of this. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * comment Much of the trouble with this article, and why an article on a promising topic ground to such a sudden halt is explained here: Special:Contributions/Friendsoflm, a sudden and undiscussed insta-block on the article's novice creator. Way to WP:BITE!  8-(   Andy Dingley (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nom ignored WP:Before. Szzuk (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.