Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lansing Mall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, obviously notable. Blueboy96 19:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Lansing Mall
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete, Non notable shopping mall. please see original deletion discussion Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per original discussion. Article isn't any more notable now than it was when previously deleted. MovieMadness (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This meets WP:VERIFIABLE, meets WP:NOTE, falls under a project group WP:MALLS, and is well-written and sourced. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - whatever it may have been before, it is certainly a perfectly acceptable, properly-sourced article now. Broad agreement with Paranormal Skeptic. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as author. How on earth is this not notable? The last version didn't have any sources, this one clearly has plenty of non-trivial sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - this mall is clearly notable based on the sources included in the article and the dozens more available on Google News. A previous AfD deletion, especially one that took place 2.5 years ago, is not sufficient reason to delete the article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ten Pound Hammer and ThaddeusB.   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 16:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It has several sources and it pased it's last AFD which was worse then is was now :| Irunongames  •  play  16:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Like Echelon Mall, this mall has had a documented impact on the area economy and therefore is an integral part of the region. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and Snowball close, there's no point in leaving this open for a week.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 17:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.