Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapaliiya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Lapaliiya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fictional topic TTN (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Geographical index of Toril. BOZ (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - The fictional region completely fails the WP:GNG and has absolutely no real-world notability, as demonstrated by the complete absence of any reliable, secondary sources. And the proposed merge target mentioned above is a nearly completely un-sourced mess of cruft that I'm not sure should even be on Wikipedia itself, so I cannot recommend a redirect or merge there.  Not that there is any reliably sourced information to merge anywhere, anyways. Rorshacma (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no keep. This has no secondary sources, which means it is an article about something someone just dreamed up one day. Rockphed (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rockphed and Rorshacma.4meter4 (talk) 16:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.