Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapidomator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Yair Lapid. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Lapidomator

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I thought about deletion as an attack page, but there are good RSs to the use of the term. Maybe the community can decide what to do about this  DGG ( talk ) 09:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello everybody.
 * As DGG wrote, there were good Reliable sources for this article. I have not invented it, nor did any original research.
 * I wrote the article more than two months ago, and it was quite late to ask for deletion now.
 * Reference #17 in the article said: "Lapid amused by Lapidomator app", and stated Lapid's words: "I had a contest with the kids. They would enter, say, the word 'hummus', and I would write something, and then we would check the Lapidomator and see if it was similar." Lapid told it his followers in the social network, and also said on a different occasion that the Lapidomator wrote better than him: "I'm a little offended, because it writes as me better than I do sometimes. So that bothers me a little, but otherwise it's quite funny."
 * It is evident that Lapid has not made any lawsuit against the Lapidomator's creators, and the Lapidomator still generates statuses. Until now, It has generated 323,759 statuses. Here is Lapidomator's status about the English Wikipedia:
 * "I want to talk about the English Wikipedia.
 * The issue of the English Wikipedia, a problem that was a bleeding wound in the heart of the Israeli society, comes to an agreed, sane, logical, yet determined solution. Instead of succumbing to the various sectors, the state is again acting like a sovereign who stands on its own.
 * Today, the Knesset's committee passed a law which would abolish the English Wikipedia law. It was an unjust political law, which required government officials to be held hostage by the wheeler-dealers.
 * The essence of the new politics is that every time when you have to choose between what is best for you personally and what is good for the English Wikipedia, you would always choose the English Wikipedia.
 * The answer is that after reviewing the possibilities over and over, I could not escape the conclusion that any other treatment of the English Wikipedia meant that I was making discounts.
 * Violent incitement against the English Wikipedia is a direct threat to the State of Israel and we will deal with it." Dgw (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Yair Lapid. This had a fairly nice burst of national level coverage in Israel (Hebrew) in 2013 - but this has mostly fell silent. The status generator (as well as the nature of Lapid's posts) is a legitimate piece of criticism of Lapid, and should be briefly summarized there. I don't think this is independently notable as I don't see continuing coverage. Icewhiz (talk) 12:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Yair Lapid per Icewhiz's points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.