Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapizh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Lapizh

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC, and WP:BIO - no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Current references are unreliable and/or closely affiliated with the subject Paul W (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I believe it shouldn´t be deleted as references news sites, and shows proof of a well searched and known person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hytrons (talk • contribs) 12:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Brief introductory message at, and paid promotional announcement at (see the peacock terms that would not be used by legit journalists), do not constitute the significant and reliable coverage that is necessary for notability in Wikipedia. Beyond those two brief media mentions, the person is only present in the typical social media and self-promotional sites, and Wikipedia is not for that purpose. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 16:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above. Sources are 2 seemingly-paid-promo articles, the subject's homepage, and lyrics for a song. No reliable sources and no visible notability.  Bsoyka  ( talk &middot;  contribs ) 18:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely lacking in independent coverage for WP:GNG and doesn't pass WP:NMUSIC either Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:MUSICBIO, in addition, appears to be UPE as well.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.