Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lappe Nordic Ski Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Lappe Nordic Ski Club

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a respectable ski club, but at the end of the day, it's still a ski club. I don't think it's notable. YechielMan 22:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is poorly formatted, but I think sports clubs in general have enough notability when the members include Olympic athletes and multiple members of the national teams. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete Does not provide anything to show how it could/would pass WP:ORG / WP:CORP etc. No verifiable notibility.--Dacium 01:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Who cares about some random ski club? Delete, as per nomination and Dacium's comments. Jmlk17 05:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to show notability through secondary sources and fails to even assert national or international notability.  Jody B   11:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many famous and notable skiers in the club including olympic athletes. Most ski clubs don't belong but this one does. It should be reformatted and fixed but not deleted. mako (talk•contribs) 14:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced. Our own assertions of notability don't mean squat.  It's what the sources say that counts.  Ned Wilbury 14:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Assertions of notability are not the same thing as proofs of notability, and there are no sources to back up these claims.  Even if claims that "notable" atheletes had trained there prove valid, I'm not sure "So-and-so trained here" is a criterion for notability, anyway.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. // 3R1C 17:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, really nothing worth making encyclopedic. BuickCenturydriver  (Honk, contribs)  23:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Arbustoo 01:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -(Blank) Not verifiable, and not likely to be verifiable in the foreseeable future. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orphic (talk • contribs) 07:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.