Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara Prescott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Lara Prescott

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, clearly meets WP:NAUTHOR, having a novel with reviews in NYT, Vogue, The Guardian, Washington Post, Time, etc. Jfire (talk) 00:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Seems fine to me from having a look. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 02:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Skynxnex (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep with existing sources. Reviews in both national outlets and regional ones, a profile in NYT, and other coverage of her being signed to a publishing deal, and the coverage of the fairly notable lawsuit, easily means keep. Skynxnex (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the existing article and its sources look fine to me. Mccapra (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - multiple independent reviews, meets WP:NAUTHOR #3 Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject's novel was a New York Times bestseller with notable reviews in Vogue, Entertainment Weekly, The Wall Street Journal, Publishers Weekly (starred review), BookPage (starred review) and Kirkus Reviews (starred review), to name only a few. Subject easily passes notability as a creative professional.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.