Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larissa Shasko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "I think provincial party leaders are important" isn't a valid argument, because what matters are our community-supported inclusion guidelines. They care about sources, not party leaders.  Sandstein  06:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Larissa Shasko

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I improved the article with more sources, information and updating it. She passes WP:GNG. Achaea (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There has been a little, routine coverage of the fact that Shasko led a small provincial political party for a year or two. I find nothing  to support the idea that she is a notable person or notable political leader.NotButtigieg (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:ROUTINE already was shown not to apply to people. ミラP 20:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Following the link you provided leads to WP:POLITICIAN, which make clear that political figures who have not held one of a number of specified offices need to have gotten "significant coverage" in the media. Shasko has NOT gotten such coverage.NotButtigieg (talk) 21:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment As a community, we've moved away from keeping state and provincial party leaders WP:POLOUTCOMES (see the AfD for Tom Morressey, who was chair of the Arizona Republican Party and related discussion on the Common Outcomes talk page). --Enos733 (talk) 05:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think provincial party leaders are important. (MoonlightTulsi) (talk) 04:04, 08 January 2020 Please add new comments below this line -->

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 04:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Following my speedy close of the DRV at Deletion review/Log/2020 January 10 I am relisting this. Note that the nominator's opinion should be discounted, as they have been banned, but subsequent good faith !votes should be assessed as normal.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet general notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 07:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.