Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larissa Takchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus instead of keep as there's some valid concerns about the sourcing. That said, a consensus to delete the material is not going to develop. Star  Mississippi  15:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Larissa Takchi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 11) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Food and drink, Television,  and Australia. SanAnMan (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep . One a group of Mass nominations largly based on a false premise, the claim of one event. egs Jackson was known for two series, 2014 and 2020. McKay is curently getting attention for the current season as well as the one she won. Cheliah also was in the current season. Chan is also a TV host with two seasons of a show titled with her name. Lazy nominations lacking any real before. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources, seems to have ongoing notability after the show, if not the most clear-cut case in this group. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to just about meet WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Barely meets it.. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:SUSTAINED. All of the independent significant coverage is from the time of the competition win and therefore fails BLP1E. All of the other sources are either trivial, unreliable, or lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Takchi is maintaining a profile with coverage such as and . duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: Interviews do not meet the WP:SIGCOV standard, as they are not independent of the subject. - SanAnMan (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per duffbeerforme, meets WP:SUSTAINED. The claim that interviews don't meet WP:SIGCOV is wrong - there is no policy to that effect, it is an essay merely warning users to be careful because some interviews can be promotional. There is no suggestion this is the case here. Deus et lex (talk) 08:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.