Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laromlab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Laromlab
The article looks like self-promotion; I think it is far from meeting the criteria at WP:Music. A google search for " Hate the Player, Not the Gameboy" has a single hit, at myspace. (contested prod; original author was user:Laromlab). Aleph-4 19:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails WP:MUSIC, Myspace != notability,  AmitDeshwar 02:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * if you google laromlab numerous articles in magazines across the country and world come up, as well as some record label information. i came across this from another site, so I think that pretty much solidifies it. Just becasue a band or musician does not meet the exposure standards of few, does not give them the right to delet the musicians article. Nothng is being promoted here! Its merely a history of the musician from what I can see!*Do Not Delete. Does not Fails WP:MUSIC, Myspace != notability,  Shandog 04:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.111.228 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 5 October 2006
 * delete, needs to establish notability better. Monni 12:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as the information contained in the article is unverified. I do not see any reliable sources that have discussed this artist (a myspace site is definitely not a reliable source).  Thus, since Wikipedia is not not a webspace provider or an indiscriminate collection of information, this article should be deleted.  Notability is not policy, and there are adequate and independent grounds for deletion aside from notability and WP:MUSIC.  We should rest on policy to the exclusion of notability wherever possible. &middot;  j e r s y k o   talk  &middot; 13:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.