Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larruperz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 07:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Larruperz
This article has been around since 2003, but I don't think it's worth keeping. Doesn't provide any detail about how these friends improved their local community. Not sure how much of this is extracted from a copyrighted publication (see end of article) but I think keeping this article could also be dodgy in terms of copyright. CLW 16:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Seems like it might be slightly notable from Google searches and existance of self-published book (verified via Amazon), but the article doesn't assert notability in any way.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 03:16Z 
 * Delete per Quarl. Johnleemk | Talk 07:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.