Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Allcock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 10:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Larry Allcock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, the given reason being that 'the link to the authors name was problematic. (a link to a csd'd page)Hardly surprising, there seems little proof that either work or author exist, let alone are notable. TheLongTone (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence provided that this character is discussed in any independent sources at all (much less reliable ones) and, performing the usual Google, GNews, GBooks searches, I could find no references to the character at all. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing out there to show that this character is ultimately notable. Given that the book is unfinished and there's no coverage of the book (Superfluity) in general, I'm going to say that it's unlikely that this will get that coverage anytime soon.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   01:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - We should not have an article for a non-notable character from a non-notable book, neither of which have received any independent coverage, even insignificant or unreliable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as definitely a non-notable character.  ~satellizer~ ~talk~  07:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Only source that is similar is another wiki created by the same person one day later. Mkdw talk 04:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.