Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Ashmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Larry Ashmore

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Does not meet the criteria for WP:POLITICIAN. While his political party has some coverage, there is no coverage of Ashmore himself. West Eddy (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Leader of a registered political party. Me-123567-Me (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Also falls under WP:OUTCOMES. Me-123567-Me (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Possible conflict of interest: Me-123567-Me has identified as a Evergreen Party supporter on his/her user page. West Eddy (talk) 06:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep He's the leader of a political party! My goodness - this is certainly notable in of itself. Outback the koala (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  PK  T (alk)  17:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Leader of a provincial political party in Canada has been previously established as sufficient notability. —GrantNeufeld (talk) 20:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Since folks are identifying “Possible conflict of interest”, I, too, am an EverGreen supporter (and have made no effort to hide my various political affiliations :-) —GrantNeufeld (talk) 06:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Leader of a provincial political party has not been previously established as sufficient notability -- see the current discussion at Articles for deletion/Bill Hewitt (teacher) -- particularly when the party has never elected a single member of the provincial legislature. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That discussion of Bill Hewitt is about party Presidents, not party Leaders, so has no bearing on this discussion. President and Leader are two very different roles — A party leader is the public head of a party and typically guides the policy direction, where a party president is the administrative head of a party and typically guides the operations of the party organization. Being president of a political party is not a basis for notability as it is usually not a very public role, if at all. The leader of a party is a very public role and inherently garners some notability. —GrantNeufeld (talk) 02:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I withdraw my recommendation and am now neutral. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, I believe there is enough coverage. He isn't the leader of the smallest party, which only fielded one candidate, the Evergreen Party was even mentioned in a couple of polls, and ran a candidate for Senate. 117Avenue (talk) 03:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.