Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry D. Webster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Larry D. Webster

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Remarkably gushing bio of unremarkable post-production producer. Chock full of direct links and no references. Fails to meet WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, bombastic promotional article for a non-notable film editor. Note that User:Filmbiz also created an overblown article for Webster's company Media Magik Entertainment (e.g., "Media Magik had broken the feature film barrier"), a company with only 383 unique GHits and, like Webster himself, no news coverage.  Someone may care to take a look at it.    Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 00:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I have rarely seen such self-aggrandizement. Webster isn't even an editor - his IMDB page lists the majority of his credits as being in the nebulous area of "post production" or "editorial". Non-notable. Evalpor (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I was sorting through external links and discovered that the article has been cut-and-pasted from another source. Possible copyright infringement. Evalpor (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Not one reference, no news coverage, clearly non-notable Glen 08:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm sure he's a real innovator behind the screen, but that does not make one notable. If it did, we'd be filled with stubs about music video directors and post-production crew. Bearian (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.