Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Kuca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Larry Kuca

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

per WP:BLP1E and WP:CRIME individual known only for involvement in one event, in which he was convicted of a misdemeanor. see --  The Red Pen of Doom  21:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, irrelevant to the encyclopedia, WP, now, is full of irrelevant, peripheral topics in articles. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It just does not belong, then? - The Bushranger One ping only 07:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG. should stay. The delete opinion above seem to be a personal opinion without fundation in any guideline.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * note to closing admin the generic vote Above is a spree of 7 keep !votes in 10 minutes by this editor. LibStar (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * exactly how is WP:BLP1E and WP:CRIME not a policy/guideline based position? -- The Red Pen of Doom  20:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * and do you have any sources to show that the meeting of the GNG that you state extends beyond the coverage of the one event? -- The Red Pen of Doom  20:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. My search revealed no sources of notability not connected with this specific crime and I conclude that this is a case of WP:BLP1E.  I'd suggest a merge but there is a line in WP:Whitewater controversy that seems sufficient, although a redirect might be appropriate.  Ubelowme U  Me  22:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: per BLP1E. A Google News archival search for Kuca turns up only five hits in the last ten years, all of them from an Arkansas business publication listing the sales of this or that property owned by a holding company of which he is president.  This is a textbook case of BLP1E's requirement of enduring notability, and I suggest that BabbaQ take the time to look at the links cited before claiming that Wikipedia guidelines "seem to be a personal opinion without fundation [sic]", a startling remark from someone so active at AfD.   Ravenswing   08:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.