Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry North


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   KEEP  Sufficiently notable at this point. Likely to become even more notable in the coming months. Article clearly needs improvement, but that can be said for most WP articles. Mike Cline (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Larry North

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The subject of this article does not meet WP:PERPETRATOR or WP:BLP1E. While there are a number of sources that discuss his arrest, there is no more coverage of the subject beyond that. NW ( Talk ) 02:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   international sourcing of potential terrorist makes for permanent notability. Not News is not intended to be applied to important instances like this, but to mentions, and tabloid-style material.  DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC).


 * Keep per DGG...he seems to have taken the words out of my mouth. This isn't an update on what he did to that place at that time last night; this is simply a stub on a domestic terrorist. 7OA   chat  03:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No !vote from me, because I think it's too early to tell if Larry North is notable, but just a note to say I cut the article to an even shorter stub for NPOV and BLP compliance at this point in the debate.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  11:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Recent, but still no less notable than, say, George Metesky.  Heather (talk) 23:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think there is a good possibility of expansion for this article. RFerreira (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.