Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Smith (economics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Larry Smith (economics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. He is an adjunct associate professor, with minimal Google Scholar citations (as far as I can tell; search needs qualifying because of his very common name) and little to no coverage by Independent Reliable Sources. MelanieN (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not demonstrated. Instructors are almost never satisfy WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's possible to be notable for teaching but the article doesn't present adequate evidence for it, nor for passing WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, sounds like he's pretty good at his job but that's not a notability criteria. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.