Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Albinsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Lars Albinsson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:PROD that I have chosen to reject due to the substantial list of publications, including three books. I personally have no opinion on the topic, but I feel that it's worthy of AFD nonetheless. The individual whom nominated this for PROD suggested that it could be a vanity autobiography. Esteffect (talk) 04:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * keep. Those publications show a certain notability. Mdd (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * delete. Not everyone who writes a couple of generally ignored books is notable enough to have a bio in wikipedia. If you google him, there is no indication of notability, just his own webpage, facebook, and a few things like that. This is less impact than the typical college professor, who has a few dozen published articles and a few specialist books written and published. It looks like a vanity bio, because the level of detail in the article is out of proportion to the significance of the subject. Dark Formal (talk) 00:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete Fails WP:BIO, nothing notable in this article. scope_creep (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.