Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Edlund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Opened by an LTA. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gomorisy. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Lars Edlund

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No importence,No notability. In the world lacks of musicians are there.Wikipedia is not platform for all of them.Even he elected as a member "Royal Swedish Academy of Music" is not a notability. We cant create articles all hundreds of members of this academy. (Gomorisy (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) Gomorisy (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Four other language Wikipedia pages is a telltale sign of possible notability. Searching google books one sees quite a few books written by Edlund, and per this book in English (by Strimple) which has a biographical entry on Edlund, Edlund's training books were influential in the field of ear training. The appear to be many more book and scholar hits, in a variety of languages. He appears to meet NAUTHOR. Edlund was also a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, which is of some importance.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

*Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER. Most of the article's sources do not mention him. his work is not notable and the articles are too brief to establish notability.(Cklabert (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC) *Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I searched Google, ProQuest and but couldn't get valuable sources. Subject does not meet our notability standards. (Karappodiii (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * In my opinion COMPOSER is the wrong yardstick as he is notable not for his compositions (late in his career) but for his writing on theory and training (so AUTHOR). In addition to Strimple, see the 1982 International Music Guide or White that calls Modus Novus the "standard handbook for atonal ear training in Sweden and in many other countries" or de Larminat who refers to Modus Novus and Modus Vetus as " key work in German-speaking countries". When searching I s see lots of non-English sources out there that I can't understand as easily.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 09:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - per google books search. Per sources. Per WP:GNG. The nom itself is a flawed WP:IDONTLIKEIT rationale with no basis in Wikipedia guidelines per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.BabbaQ (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.