Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Moe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Lars Moe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He was for some years rector of a local university, but this doesn't validate WP:BIO OR WP:PROF per se. Not enough academic achievements, since he is not in any list with highly cited researchers or with any highly impact publication. Chiserc (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Norway. Chiserc (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment There seems to be coverage in Norwegian media. This appears to be in a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 13:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is some coverage. I have found some sources based on WP:BEFORE: Vettimes, E24, and the one source you mentioned. However, I don't think this coverage is enough for notability. Chiserc (talk) 14:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep in the strength of https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lars-Moe/publication/11571627_Population-based_incidence_of_mammary_tumours_in_some_dog_breeds/links/62383edabe72d414dad174ca/Population-based-incidence-of-mammary-tumours-in-some-dog-breeds.pdf (Google Scholar says cited by 278) and his other work (in some cases, he is not the primary author) and as a university president (which I think rector is a synonym for). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There are academic publications that had some impact, I agree with that, but there should be always a caution with Google Scholar, as mentioned in the citation metrics. I have seen his Scopus profile Lars Moe and his h-index is 22. I don't have access on his Web of Science profile to double-check it, but I don't think his impact is quite convincing to establish WP:PROF. Chiserc (talk) 10:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the comments above, regarding his impact factor. Oaktree b (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.