Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Muñecas que hacen pum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Las Muñecas que hacen pum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as I found no in-depth reviews. PROD removed with "contesting PROD - there are apparently 3 'reviews' on the Spanish Wikipedia article", but are they in-depth enough to count toward notability or are they passing mentions. Donald D23  talk to me  02:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Argentina.  Donald D23   talk to me  02:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. ...but are they in-depth.... Didn't you check before nominating for deletion? SpinningSpark 14:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The first two cites on Spanish Wikipedia are to this book.  The cite to p. 179 appears to be a passing mention and gbooks won't serve p. 795.  However, p. 428 (not cited) appears to have something more than trivial.  The third cite is this book which clearly has something towards GNG as there is a section heading with the film title.  I also found a couple of things that, while not being in-depth themselves, suggest an Argentine newspaper search is going to turn up more.  There is this book which says in a footnote there was a public controversy over the lack of sexual censorship of the film leading to its eventual banning in at least two South American countries.  And this magazine article criticises the film for being an apologist for the military dictatorship. SpinningSpark 14:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as per the Spark who Spins. Hyperbolick (talk) 05:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 06:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * care to elaborate why you think the sources I found do not support notability? Spinning<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 10:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * As nominator of the deletion I concur with Spinning Spark that the new citations make this pass WP:GNG at the very least. My opinion is now Keep Donald D23   talk to me  16:19, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I will also amend my vote to Keep based on the new sources. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 18:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.