Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaserShip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 23:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

LaserShip

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non notable company WP:notability Wayne Jayes (talk) 11:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  11:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  11:51, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples:, , , :


 * – NorthAmerica1000 10:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - the nominator fails to state why the company is "non notable" when the sources indicated that the article meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Fiachra10003 (talk) 18:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by NorthAmerica ... Seems now the nomination is invalid.... – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG and WP:ORG--180.172.239.231 (talk) 09:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.